I think a lot of people perceive the bank as having zero assets and the FDIC is covering 100% of the deposits. Some $200B or whatnot. But most of what people deposited didn’t just vanish.
I think a lot of people perceive the bank as having zero assets and the FDIC is covering 100% of the deposits. Some $200B or whatnot. But most of what people deposited didn’t just vanish.
If the people who pulled out all their assets fast enough keep 100% and the people who didn't keep 95%, and normal people are banking, this is slightly unstable but most people aren't going to bring down the financial system to slightly reduce their risk of losing 5%. The system has been working like this for 70 years.
The current batch of Silicon valley/new york financial types would stab an orphan in the face with their mother's fine silverware, to avoid losing 5%.
That's not an adequate response to a systemic risk against the entire banking system.
And fair enough. I won’t pretend to understand just how much risk there was to the entire system. But obviously the officials felt it was immense.