Hacker News Reader

Isn't the first row both the declaration and definition is this case?

(I assume f() is a call.)

C (and C++) considers the declaration to be separate from the definition, though you can combine them. The declaration is the name + type, definition provides a value. The example code is meant to illustrate separate declaration and definition with some code (the call to `f`) between the two.

If you try to use `x` before it is defined (the assignment) your compiler should give you a warning, at least. If it doesn't, find a new compiler.

For block-scope declarations, it's not the definition but the initialization that you're thinking of. At least in C, every block-scope variable declaration is a definition:

> A definition of an identifier is a declaration for that identifier that:

> — for an object, causes storage to be reserved for that object; [...]

But initialization (in C) does not occur for block-scope objects without the optional initializer.

Okay, that's somewhat confusing. So a declaration is when the identifier enters the scope, and a definition is for a variable specifically. So a declaration that's not a definition could be a forward declaration for a function, or a typedef.

Yes, or the declaration of an extern variable.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com