You're of course getting engagement here. But the key difference is this: Abgnale outputted nothing.
Steve Jobs outputted Apple, Pixar and Next (basis of Macos and iOS).
You can quibble over what share of what credit for the specific products of each of those three companies. But there's no disputing Next wouldn't have existed without him, nor Apple, and Apple would have failed without him. Pixar had been declined by 45 other investors; only Jobs said yes. So it likely would not have got off the ground without him.
Everyone involved in the output of those companies speaks highly of him and ascribe him a vital role. Key competitors do the same.
Your argument amounts to say:
1. He had a well known reality distortion field
2. Therefore he accomplished nothing and everyone who was there on the ground is wrong, for they were subject to this field
3. All of the output of those companies happened, no thanks to Jobs.