Hacker News Reader

I hate limitations as much as the next person, but these tools are viewed as generators by company xyz. You don’t want Disney to sue Adobe because the tool can circumvent IP and abuse it.

“Draw a Disney logo but for adults”

That image now lives on Adobe.com

View on HN

> You don’t want Disney to sue Adobe

No, you don’t want Disney to sue Adobe.

So, the above was somewhat flip and terse, but the kind of lawsuit being avoided is also the kind of thing that provides clarity on legal issues and removes spaces of doubt. This can be broadly beneficial.

Giants battling it out can result in a clearer environment for everyone else that couldn’t afford legal risk in an environment of doubt.

What if I draw the logo with a regular 2B pencil?

I want to see Disney sue Faber-Castell for making great pencils I used for my deviant art

Also IANAL but even then there's probably fair use rights in parodying their logo

Does your art live on Adobe.com? I tried to make this clear. Currently “who made it” isn’t as clear as for paper and pencil. AI isn’t a seen as a plain tool yet, it’s part of the artist.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com