Is It Time to Say Goodbye to Barnes & Noble?
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
The long and short of the article is that everyone's scared of Amazon, because Amazon is actually selling what consumers want, and are leveraging their consumer power to cut out the publishers completely. This has the appearance of a big win for consumers and for writers, but the publishers worry that they can't "mold talent" any more, and have finally realized that the middleman loses when he forgets to provide what people want. It's a complete play-by-play of the Kill Hollywood models we've been talking about recently.
NYT paints the publishers as a poor industry who are getting swirlies from the school bully, so they really hope that Barnes & Noble will save them. As always with the cartels, they want to hold on to the past and their print books (even when they that put the ridiculous, onerous DRM on their e-books and people are still buying them). What they won't do is acknowledge that Amazon has changed the game on them, and fight Amazon toe-to-toe: ie. actually merge with Barnes and Noble. They want a proxy battle, and if B&N eats it, then they don't lose anything.
Personal prediction: without a merger with one or two publishing companies, B&N as we know it dies within 5 years. Renting that floor space and paying those employees is just too much overhead. The last play will be to shutter their big stores, and cut themselves right down to small boutique stores on highly foot-trafficked areas, that focus entirely on pushing Nooks and eBooks.
I wonder what could replace it in the future :-/
I really hope whatever replaces the experience is not fully digital.
Of course that might hasten the demise of their brick and mortar stores or turn them into something like an Apple genius bar.
I received a BN gift card for Christmas which I used online. Now I am receiving 2-3 emails a week from BN trying to interest me in buying other books. Unlike the ones from Amazon what they're offering me is almost laughably irrelevant.
I used the same credit card with which I have bought hundreds of books from BN and either they can't match it to the email I gave them to get a hint of my interests or they don't care. So unless I receive another gift card they're not going to receive any future business from me.
It really doesn't matter anymore. Both Amazon and Apple are destroying this idea because they own the hardware and the software. What disturbes me is that no one has come up with a proper solution similar to public libraries.
Maybe they'll come around in time and open the market to everybody. Then there could be competition on ebook readers.
I'd love to switch to ebooks completely, but I still can't stomach the fact that I don't own the ebooks I "buy", and that I can not just read whatever I want on my reader (at least not without a lot of hassle). Or even switch readers at will - these days buying an app or an ebook is essentially just cementing the vendor lock in, which is of course intentional.
Especially with the existence of that last category, it's tough going for someone who's genuinely curating book selections, perhaps even reading the books and providing good advice about them, when a lot of their competitors in the space are just algorithmically throwing together lists of books based on keywords. To a quick glance (the kind you normally get from search-engine visitors), it's hard to differentiate yourself from them. It might be possible to more slowly build up a fanbase of regular readers, though. Some book blogs have done that, which is not exactly the same format you're talking about, but has some similarities.
As for money in the affiliate program, I have a small web site where I tested it, and I realized it sucks: if somebody buys a book through my link, I get perhaps 1 to 3€ (Europe here). But only a tiny fraction of visitors clicks, and a tiny fraction of those buys anything. Meanwhile, every click on an Adsense ad gets me 10 to 50 cents... Adsense wins easily.
The only times it seems to be effective is if people click on your Affiliate link and then go on to buy expensive stuff like iPods or TVs. A friend of mine told me he was making money for years because of a a comment on some discussion board recommending some cheap cable (forgot the details). People who bought the cable also bought other more expensive tech stuff... In any case he said the discussion board people have caught on and now insert their own links.
I keep seeing people say that they'll miss bookstores, but I can't imagine what they'll miss.
Bookstores are very inefficient. Ordering books they don't have is a pain. You literally have to judge a book by its cover, or at least the 5 minutes you spend perusing it. Finding books in the shelves is difficult. A lot of people seem to think that Amazon is winning on price alone, but it's because they're offering a better product.
So I don't know why people keep saying they'll miss bookstores. The atmosphere? Isn't that replicated by coffee shops?
With Amazon, I get the TOC, I get reviews that tell me whether the book is any good or not (which is better than a gut reaction, for me at least), and if I really want to delve into what's in the book, Google Books usually does a good job of showing me some relevant pages.
I don't have time to read an entire book, nor peruse for 20 minutes. I think the people who are like that are the ones who want bookstores to stay, but those people are a very small minority.
For me, digital systems have three big advantages over printed books. (1) I can access them anywhere, (2) searching and hopping between hyperlinks is much faster than paper citation tracking, (3) if I already know exactly what I’m looking for, it’s usually possible to find it quickly.
But quite often I don’t know what I’m looking for. Almost every time I walk into a good bookstore, I end up walking out with a book I’d never have thought to buy online. In those cases, searching faster or clicking more hyperlinks wouldn’t help me, and overall the time spent online would have been more usefully spent actually reading.
In my opinion publishers both of old media such as books and modern media such as tv and films need to disappear.
Then we can get a global distribution network going that no longer tells me "this content is not available in your area".
This concept of nationalised distribution rights is of no benefit to me as a consumer.
If the publishers valued the service offered by Barnes & Noble, the obvious solution is to grant lower prices to brick-and-mortar bookstores.
According to the article, the whole industry benefits from and depends upon customers being able to physically browse shelves of real books. Perhaps the whole industry should start subsidizing physical bookstores.
My understanding was that this is how the printed book industry works already. Book stores are filled with books they didn't pay for -- the publishers are the ones covering nearly the entire inventory cost of the store! Only once a book is sold does the store pay the publisher the wholesale rate for that copy, while unsold copies are returned to the publisher to be shipped to a different store or destroyed.
What I've seen on publishers' websites are examples like a $12 wholesale cost for a $20 retail book. That's a 40% margin, on top of the publishers subsidizing the existence of the store by providing the inventory for free.
The reason your comment is being downvoted is probably because they can't "start" subsidizing margins when they already are.