This is an example of a practical concern that I'm not sure meshes with what we might presume is our shared philosophical underpinnings.

Why is the burden placed on the employer to grow their employee and not the human being to grow themselves? In a generic sense, it could be outside of the purview of the employer to consider the employee's future in that specific way (in other ways it makes more sense, like health and happiness while employed).

It seems oddly paternalistic, to me, and once you remove that moral presumption doesn't the conversation become more complex?