Hacker News Reader

Well, no, that isn't freedom of speech. That's the 1st Amendment, acknowledging the existence and inalienable nature of freedom of speech.

View on HN

Suppose Martin Shkreli wanted to go on a diatribe in Hillary Clinton's bedroom. Would her excluding him from her domicile be a violaton of his first amendment right? Obviously not.

Now suppose he were already invited to her domicile, but she and Bill found him annoying so they told him to either stuff it or leave. Would that violate his first amendment right? Also no.

Now replace the Clintons and Shkreli with Stanford and the protesters, respectively.

I think you may be misunderstanding me - I was saying that the comment I replied to was describing the limits of the 1st amendment, not freedom of speech. Free speech is a principle, not a right granted by the constitution.

People all too often conflate the two. What people commonly think of as "free speech" when referring to their 1st amendment right goes way beyond your actual legal rights to speech as delineated by that 1st amendment and centuries' worth of case law.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com