I found the awk syntax to be surprisingly discoverable, once I got the rough structure of scripts.

I think the confusing factor with awk is that it allows you to leave out variuos levels of structure in the really simple scripts, meaning that the same scripts you see around will look quite different.

E.g. all the following would be the same (looking for the string "something" in column 1, and printing only those lines):

'$1 == "somestring"'

'$1 == "something" { print }'

'($1 == "something")'

'($1 == "something") { print }'

... to give a small example.

At least this confused me a lot in the beginning.

Awk syntax is basically what became core Javascript according to its creator [1]. Bourne shell syntax is very different so I take your comment as a frustrated reaction to the "Python obsolete" comment which must be seen in context with Python introducing itself as an awk replacement among other things (though not nearly as aggressive as Perl which use to have the a2p script to bogusly convert awk to Perl code).

[1]: https://brendaneich.com/2010/07/a-brief-history-of-javascrip...

I can agree on bash syntax being crazy, but certainly not on awk. Awk is very simple, a man page is all you need if you need to find something. Otherwise what's so complex with awk?

It's easy. You just need to stop thinking of these things as toys...

Awk + bash could easily recreate most existing code in a couple of lines

Bash is so comfortable to write in, its like you are just writing psuedocode. Pipes >>>>>>> a dozen parentheses I forget to close half the time.