Hacker News Reader

I've started pondering what a language would look like that was optimized for LLMs, where token length is the most important budget.

Maybe a language with 10,000 keywords would actually be better in LLM world?

View on HN

Fewer "decorations". I imagine it would look more like Ocaml than Rust or C++ because the grammar of Ocaml is such that you don't really need brackets or braces or parentheses most of the time. And "system" languages like C++ and Rust are notorious for being symbol soup, which is unavoidable if you want to control every single detail of every single thing.

Are you designing for LLM to LLM communication, or do you still expect humans to understand and work with this language?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com