Obviously, I'm not smart enough to do it or else I'd be doing it. However, I'm not going around making wild claims either. I think something like that would help rather than hinder OpenBSD.
I'm an old man now and maybe I've gone a bit soft but I don't see much benefit in mocking and am more interested in helping even if that means wasting a bit of time.
Some years ago there was a leak of plans to do that very with Tor. Spreading FUD so less secure systems are used. Discrediting contributors, turning people against each other and so on.
Common theme. If someone has a way to break something, they'd at least gain publicity for it, if they have any positive interest they'll at least mention a source or provide any chance for rebuttal (the whole point of the scientific method), if neither happens be at least skeptical.
When Luca Todesco (the person who wrote that toot) tells you your exploit mitigations are trash, you listen.
Like I said, I'm not going to make any claims to being an elite hacker. I have a cool job that I love, and I enjoy doing this stuff for fun too to keep my skills sharp. But reading through that presentation, there's nothing that made me pause and think "This is a game over scenario." If you have a moderately powerful bug with halfway decent primitives these mitigations aren't really going to stop anyone.
An elite team like NSO group? This isn't going to effect them one bit.