By violating that trust, it will make teams wary of building on top of Google's higher-level services where there is the most lock-in, which unfortunately for Google, is also where the highest margins are.
By violating that trust, it will make teams wary of building on top of Google's higher-level services where there is the most lock-in, which unfortunately for Google, is also where the highest margins are.
part of the implicit risk in using someone else's computers
on the bright side, when a large provider changes conditions, similarly run competition will also see their costs rise
other competition that took a safer, perhaps more expensive path, will now be more competitive
I have not followed this space for almost a decade now but I assume that on-premise costs have also gone up in the last couple of years. They had to do that in order to compensate for the higher energy costs (especially here in Europe) and for the higher employees-related costs (even though those costs might be easing right now).
On the other hand I do not know how the higher cloud costs compare to the (presumably) higher on-premise costs in terms of percentages.
Has it been?
Conventional wisdom is that AWS is more reliable to trust to build on top of. My interactions buying cloud services is that the AWS account managers are more trustworthy and reliable (although they spend less time building personal rapport and small talk). And this kind of thing just confirms that.