Sounds like a recipe for increase in demand for goods/services, coupled with a simultaneous reduction in productivity. Won't this just make the country as a whole poorer?
Hasn't productivity been on the rise the past X years? Shouldn't we have a little slack by this point?
That being said, there are also claimed and real second-order effects of policies whose first-order economic effect is deadweight-loss. The entirety of government fits this description! To use the most trite and least controversial example, confiscating resources to build roads is redistribution from heavier taxpayers to heavier road users (incl downstream beneficiaries), but the second-order effects of a functional transportation are enough that we don't consider it to "make the country as a whole poorer"