Hacker News Reader

> but this is ultimately placing the convenience of the developers ahead of the privacy and autonomy of the users.

Is it though? Putting aside the issue of whether you trust the person collecting telemetry for a second. You can collect telemetry completely anonymized. You don't have store IPs or any sort of personal identifier. I know a certain crowd still won't like it but in practice how does that harm the privacy of the user?

View on HN

The very act of making a network connection (data points: network address + time of use) makes it impossible to be truly anonymous https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2013/06/09/using-metad...

> You can collect telemetry completely anonymized.

You can't.

You can decide to discard identifying information (although only if you aggregate and don't insert some sort of "anonymous" identifier), sure. But you're still going to collect it.

So it all boils down to trusting not only the developer, but any company or interest that might acquire the developer or product in the future. And I think it has been repeatedly demonstrated that this trust is not well-placed.

> You can't.

Of course you can! Just route telemetry through Tor.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com