I don't want to mark them down for poor language skills but the style of the comments on the TabbyML GitHub profile suggests a rather casual approach, and when combined with a lack of any serious documentation or even basic details beyond a sketched architecture diagram, I kind of wonder... Is there any particular context others can point to that I may be overlooking?
I tried it and it worked OK.
this is enthusiast level territory that doesn't require professional window dressing at the moment
if you’re the kind of person that needs that then you aren’t the target audience yet
The idea of client side LLMs is kind of obviously a winner, who wouldn't want that and who hasn't thought of that, so this shouldn't shoot to the top on that basis.
The repo looks close to thrown together vapourware. I'm keen not to undermine their efforts since we all aspire to create great things but the fact this has risen so high with so little supporting evidence says more about the current mood here.
So all sorts of vaporware will fill that, and people will commend other people that seemingly take the initiative instead of just thinking about it
There is a huge group of people who are interested in using Copilot, but are not allowed (or don't want) to share their code with a 3rd party service.
AFAIK there is Fauxpilot and now there is this second project. Of course it got attention based on the promise/idea alone, because many people are curious whether it could be useful for them.