The "same" cables on the "near" pylon #11 (the one that collapsed was #9) had been replaced in years 1992-1996 because of severe corrosion.
Everyone was expecting that the same replacement would have been soon made on the pylons #9 and #10 but the inspections (circa 1991) that were made (boring holes to visually inspect the cables in a few points) and, although these inspections (obviously) showed some relevant corrosion it was underestimated, and anyway no correction measures were taken in a timely manner (please read as in the next 25 years).
That the bridge was overloaded (by traffic as much as 4-5 times the amount it was designed for originally) and that it needed interventions was a known fact and starting 2006-2009 there were several projects about demolishing and rebuilding it that were never finalized/approved.
A new inspection made in 2015 evidenced the very poor state of the cables, the results of this inspection were once again underestimated or even falsified.
A project was made for replacing/reinforcing the cables in 2017 (20+ years after the works on #11 and 2 years after latest inspection) and the bid for it was published only a few months before the bridge collapsed in 2018.
It was a story of incompetence, sloppyness and greed.