But every single day, pretty much everywhere in the world, a sizable portion of humanity uses a device that he ultimately brought into being. And I thought that was pretty cool.
But every single day, pretty much everywhere in the world, a sizable portion of humanity uses a device that he ultimately brought into being. And I thought that was pretty cool.
Jobs has been a salesman more than an engineer. He did not need to understand tech, he just wanted to sell it.
Without Steve Jobs there would have been no iPhone and we would have settled for a Windows CE like phone. Just look at what Android was before the release of the iPhone. That would have been the major leap.
That’s the difference.
Libre software democratized the access to technology, science and free as in freedom books on lots of term and inspired parallel licenses for media and documents.
In 1995 you would need to spend $300 dollars in books and $3500 in a proper workstation to run scientific software. Later, with GNU/Linux, the costs plummeted down. Today you have free compilers, free documentation and cheap NUCs to learn the basics on nearly any STEM career, at least if you can simulate it.
You can even compose music and multimedia FFX with libre distros and DAW software. There are even neural network based translators with libre licenses and models. That's astounding.
Consider Library Genesis/Sci-Hub, Wikipedia, citizen science, instant messaging, online dating, torrents, Bellingcat, etc.
Whilst Jobs was only human and there are plenty of anecdotes about negative personality traits in regard to how he treated others, he was definitely someone who knew how to work a room of average people rather than a room of neckbeards.
For a further example of social abrasiveness within open source, look to Linus Torvalds. As with Stallman, a genuinely brilliant chap, but some people aren't meant to be in the public eye, they're people who are in their element behind-the-scenes.
Software isn't very sexy. Curvy, pretty consumer hardware is something the average Joe can lust after. Ask the average Joe on the street if they know what Emacs or Linux is, but they'll know about consumer-oriented Apple products.
https://stallmansupport.org/the-practice-of-ritual-defamatio...
Even women close to Stallman had to stop people like you defamating people.
I know I'm going to get downvotes for this; but I disagree. While Stallman played an important role in GNU and Libre software through his work at MIT and FSF, there were already like-minded people working towards the same thing. It's hard to say that Stallman single-handedly influenced things like that in history to that much impact, given how much impact Steve Jobs had on the personal computing space.
Without Linux (Linus Torvalds), he may not have had much impact at all.
Let's not forget:
- Brian Reid who co-authored BSD Unix operating system under a permissive license, which used BCC (Berkeley C Compiler) - Bill Joy who co-founded Sun Microsystems - among contributions count NFS, Sparc, Java
Who knows what would have arisen from that, had not Stallman had a fortuitous partnership with Torvalds? Would we be living in a world with OpenBSD rather than GNU/Linux?
With the GNU utilities Sparc and Java wouldn't be as used as they were. Everyone and his aunt used GCC, Bash and GNU utilities. And Emacs.
Even ksh form OpenBSD got autocompletion support. Some features are nice, I guess. And I use mksh myself on Hyperbola GNU/Linux, which mostly blends GNU's openness with BSD's KISS stance. No SystemD here, not even Pulse. Sndio, the same one as OpenBSD.
On OpenBSD, I love their stance on security and correctness, and ofc I know about pledge(4) and unveil(4). that's why Hyperbola will rebase their Unix-like OS from OpenBSD (minus the blobs) with GNU addons.
Being more convenient doesn't quals changing the world... While Sun was hugely influential in the early days of the internet it's place could have been taken by a lot of other *nix vendors.