Yes, that's the "tough" part of "tough love."
> How much due diligence do you perform on the decrepit man sitting on the sidewalk, holding out a cup of change, before you decide to throw some his way?
People on the sidewalk are typically not soliciting fifty to five thousand dollars. And if I meet someone on the sidewalk I can see their face and have a conversation with them which helps me assess whether or not they are trying to scam me.
> I'm somewhat like the psychologist, from your film, who had a practice, and now can't get a job at Burger King, but not for lack of trying.
The psychologist's name is (or was -- he died recently) Michael. And it's pretty clear that you haven't actually seen the film because if you had you would know that Michael was very much the author of his own fate.
> Preferring anonymity is not a crime, nor should it be a handicap.
It's not a crime, but it's not an entitlement either. Anonymity has a price.
> that first post ... received no replies
And did you stop to consider why it got no replies? And what you might do differently to change that?
> If I had the little bit of financial support that I requested, I could (and would) produce polished public output.
I sincerely wish you the best of luck. But if you fail to get the "little bit of financial support that you requested", you might want to consider the possibility that this is the result of choices you have made, and if you make different choices you might get different outcomes.