Seems easily countered by using the same toxicity prediction software when evaluating synthesis requests (but I'm not sure whether this actually matters, or whether skilled chemists can easily synthesize anything themselves anyway).
Seems easily countered by using the same toxicity prediction software when evaluating synthesis requests (but I'm not sure whether this actually matters, or whether skilled chemists can easily synthesize anything themselves anyway).
It's important to remember. Chemical warfare can be used for mass destruction, but this approach could be used for other nefarious things at smaller more discrete scales en masse. ie 1000 attacks with different agents in each one... Forensic nightmare.
I like your suggestion to counter these things, but, these are predictive tools. They can and often are or will be wrong. False positives would be a real problem. Again though the people interested in doing this won't be dialing up a chemical supplier to do it for them.