The progress is a nice outcome. Even if it makes the asshole owner richer.
Especially because the progress should be open for any tech funded by taxpayer dollars.
I don#t suppose there is any chance you can explain what this means. Shareholder manipulation? What exploitation do you reductively observe?
Here’s a recent link to some examples. At SpaceX.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/17/former-spacex-employees-file...
Far as shareholder manip - I mean the choice to take roi over people is the shareholders manipulating the company into allowing this behavior by its ceo and to its employees.
Where did this idea that SpaceX is heavily subsidized by the government come from?
No, the government being a customer != subsidies. (If anything, the government is paying less than market rate, thanks to SpaceX's reusability.)
I worry some corps will allow for accepting funds and privatizing the profit. Then pivot into needing subsidies because they’re “too big to fail”
With the way musk runs things… That’s what I’m worried about.