No, I was not referring to the title. It was not be the best, but it was not misleading. Readers followed the link on the title, read the article and voted it up to the front page anyway.
Why to kill a front page thread with a lively discussion?
Why to kill a front page thread with a lively discussion?
However, I am puzzled what was problematic with that story apart from that it challenged certain consensus scientific views (which was the reason for submitting it on Hackers News).