Most of the time she still reaches for her old Android because it unlocks instantly (and properly, not to a stupid lock screen!) with a fingerprint.
My Samsung on the other hand always opens flawlessly with a fingerprint scanner.
What is Apple trying to avoid here by not including one?
The dark makes no sense. It’s not using visible spectrum, it uses IR laser dots and flood illuminator coupled with an IR camera to map and photograph your face in 3d.
Mask Auth only works afaik with iPhone 12 and greater.
Apple used to include Touch ID. Some devices still have it (iPads etc). They are trying to avoid something though - there’s no physical space on the devices for finger print scanner. The iPad integrates it into the on/off button which is large and exposed. But most phones have very small physical buttons that are typically covered by cases. The rest of the screen (sans notch) is edge to edge touch screen.
On my iPhone 14 the Face ID is basically flawless and very fast. I would suspect your “new” device that’s second gen Face ID is simply not as capable as the fifth gen on market today.
But, dude, if you like android, go for it.
> While there are mixed opinions from privacy experts on which is more secure, Apple claims that Face ID is 20 times more secure than Touch ID. While the chances of someone unlocking your iPhone using a spoofed fingerprint is one in 50,000, this number grows exponentially to a false positive of one in a million when it comes to Face ID.