Their minimum standard for inclusion appears to be any collection of if-statements.
This is the same standard for any Startup claiming to leverage AI, so I think that's fair
This measure of “fairness” merely impairs the utility of the data. Any standard based on puff-piece marketing is inherently garbage. There’s no research or policy value in dragging our thinking down to the same level.
Unsurprisingly, many of their taxonomies are 30-50% labelled “Other”, a common warning flag of either junk data or lazy classifications.
Note that the graphs on the taxonomy pages collapse labels outside the top nine under "all others." The incidents aren't literally labelled "other."
It's even more loose than that! There are "incidents" of production lines not meeting quotas, requiring more manual labor. I guess conveyor belts are AI.