> I can find novel solutions to complex problems [in science]
If you do that, ChatGPT will continuously explain entry-level stuff wrongly to you. If science paper would be in its training, that would be much more useful maybe.
If you do that, ChatGPT will continuously explain entry-level stuff wrongly to you. If science paper would be in its training, that would be much more useful maybe.
That might well make it worse at science.
For this among other reasons:
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replicat...
A summary of everything that's going on in a scientific field may allow reviewers to find out which processes are solid, which ones are grounded on faulty premises or bad data, and which ones merit further research. Doing the same without the AI summarisations could take decades of review work.