> It's not 100km/h.
Of course it is... if you're averaging over distance. There's no reason that's less valid than whichever average you have in mind.
Of course it is... if you're averaging over distance. There's no reason that's less valid than whichever average you have in mind.
I don't doubt you're right, but I don't see it. My calculation is as follows: suppose the distance between both cities is 120km. The trip A -> B thus takes exactly one hour. The trip B -> A takes 1.5 hours (120km / 80km/h) = 1.5h. The total trip therefore takes 2.5h, the total distance is 240km, which averages at 96km/h (240/(1 + 1.5)).
A simple (V1 + V2)/2 is surely possible, but I don't see the value of that average, I can't think of a situation where it would be useful.