> imperceptible
isn't that sort of cheating, when it comes to math?
It's "almost" the thing just not the thing
isn't that sort of cheating, when it comes to math?
It's "almost" the thing just not the thing
You just have to properly define what you mean by "imperceptible" and you are good to go. Now you can look for a bounded approximation. See how it changes as things get bigger. See if it can be improved.
Bounds and approximation are generally a very useful tool. Properties simplifications and working on sub parts can also yield interesting results.
Generally I would say that if you can’t prove something, trying something close but simpler is nearly always a good idea.