So Your Kid Wants to Be a Twitch Streamer
wired.com
wired.com
Some jobs scale, some do not. Brad Pitt, Cristiano Ronaldo, Rihanna and PewDiePie all have the benefit of being in the 1% (0.1%?) of their respective professions. They reap all the rewards. But there are millions and millions of people who aren't quite at the top and they get nothing. Dentists or plumbers on the other hand provide a service to a specific number of people. Their jobs do not scale. As such they are safer from the global Internet-wide competition and automation.
Most people who try to make a living programming computers pay the bills, and the top 1% of programmers make a lot of money. There are a lot of people 'kind of' learning a bit of python at the weekend sometimes who will never be professional programmers.
Which of these is streaming like? You only need 1000 subscribers paying £10 a month to make £100K, and that is hard but not impossible to achieve. If you are reasonably smart, learn a bit about the industry, and work at it full time - it should be possible to get that many subscribers over a year or two. Right?
So are youtubers more like programmers than soccer players?
Almost nobody makes any significant money as a streamer, let alone a living.
Acting involves attunement with fellow actors and being part of a larger creative process and work. It's a lot of showing up in person and figuring out how to work with others.
Influencers need only stay at home, work a camera, and manage parasocial fan conversations. There's no inherent in-person physicality of relationships and all the socializing that entails, nor even the need for peer relationships or any connection to a larger work that the influencer is a part of. At its core it's only a streamer and some people they probably don't know watching.
I think it's important to make the distinction between people who stream video games versus professional influencers.
Disclaimer: I don't rate either.
"I don't plan to have my kid dream to become a influencer"
Yeah man control your kids dreams that'll work.
If those 1,000 office workers actually provide benefit for humanity, it's a no-brainer that they do more "good" than a YouTuber.
Not every YouTuber does what you describe. A good chunk of them are just talking heads, doing unboxings, reviews, streaming games, and just generally not doing anything that tangibly benefits humanity.
Same goes for office workers. Exceptions in every demographic though, right?