For what it's worth, I guess you're right in that this is a whataboutism. You could take this line of thinking to the extreme, do I not cut my grass, in that I might kill some ants? Like, it needs to be cut. We need to get to space and there is going to be some costs. So, yeah, they killed some birds, a bobcat, and burnt some grass. It's worth it. Until now, I didn't realize my algorithm for caring about stuff was to prioritize my outrage via whataboutisms.
Hopefully, we can agree to disagree. Wish you well.
You're criticizing the article for not participating in whataboutism?
Wow, you are literally doing it again. It's a fallacy because the topic of the article *is* space x, you're just interested in dismissing it for whatever reason. If you want to talk about the impact of the war, find an article about the war to do it on.
For clarity here:
what·a·bout·ism noun
the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.
We should hold commenters here to a higher standard than this.