> starting in 2036
WAAAAAAY too late. Even if it were "by 2036", that would STILL be too late.
WAAAAAAY too late. Even if it were "by 2036", that would STILL be too late.
I'm glad to see things forcing the issue, but I suspect this is going to lead to very awkward/stupid/worse workarounds rather than serious adoption. If we're lucky the tech will continue to progress at a pace that makes this feasible, but if they don't support this with massive rail infrastructure (which, spoiler, they won't) then there's going to be serious logistics issues.