It might be sovietophobic in the sense we would rather not have it repeat, to put mildly. But for the occupied regions, it was far from fiction.
It might be sovietophobic in the sense we would rather not have it repeat, to put mildly. But for the occupied regions, it was far from fiction.
Did you mean "to dilute regional/ethnic identity"? National identity cuts across regions and ethnicities.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Mingrelia
But the actual maps show a mosaic of principalities in place or Georgia.
I am just pointing out that Soviet Union has encouraged large ethnicities to coalesce, collect their shared history and culture (often inventing large portions in process) and build a nation state on top of that. This is not something you should take for granted, but that's what you've got under Soviet rule.
Not everybody got that privilege, of course. Ethnic Russians, but also Jews and Germans, did not get to have their own nation state in USSR. Technically, Jews had one but it was a joke[1]; Germans briefly had one[2]; Russians hoped to have one after WW2, with capital in Leningrad, but were derailed (Leningrad affair[3]). RSFSR was like a one huge Washington DC in that regard, with glistering Moscow and Leningrad but it was more like Puerto Rico as you descended into Nechernozem'ye[4]. No statehood.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volga_German_Autonomous_Soviet... 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leningrad_affair 4. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Нечерноземье
Yeah, I've heard you prefer not to mix.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust_in_Estonia#Eston...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust_in_Latvia#Arajs_...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust_in_Lithuania#Par...