I'm not familiar enough with german politics to understand, but how far up/down the chain of causality for this are the greens?
In this case the greens are supposedly responsible for a proliferation of coal by being anti-nuclear.
The reality is that the greens fight hardest for an earlier exit from coal, not hard enough though as seen from some environmentalists. In this case the greens managed that the mine is getting closed earlier but some villages will still be destroyed for it. The way they want to replace coal is with renewables.
The other big parties, SPD (social democrats), CDU/CSU (conservatives) and FDP (mostly financial liberalism) were all more for keeping nuclear but also slowing renewables down because of coal miner unions or closeness to big electricity producers, to Putin or to the industry heavily relying on cheap Russian gas. Coal and nuclear plants were run by the same companies in Germany.
You often try to see the debate being steered towards being about coal versus nuclear while the reality is nuclear + fossil fuels versus renewables
And recently they pushed forward to close down the last 3 reactors even though we might have troubles with our energy supply in the near future.
> You often try to see the debate being steered towards being about coal versus nuclear while the reality is nuclear + fossil fuels versus renewables
Just the opposite! One often sees the debate steered towards nuclear + fossil fuels vs renewables (just like you did here!), while the reality is coal vs nuclear.