And, to be clear, these restrictions would apply to someone who was still an employee and wanted to sell, not just to someone who wasn't an employee anymore. The restrictions are because of the financial considerations being offered at the purchase of the home, not because of the employment relationship.
I don't think it's great for competition since smaller companies won't be able to offer the same incentive, but it does create downward pressure on the housing market and at least the employees end up owning a major asset.
Another way to look at it is the company providing enough total compensation for their employees to buy a house. It almost seems unnaturally altruistic which kind of freaks me out. Lol.
So employee lose what exactly ? (I assume) they wouldn't be able to mortgage a property at market rate without it
> If housing wasn't increasingly difficult to come by, this wouldn't even be on the table as a compelling offer.
Well, the city doing exact same thing would certainly be preferable, but this is still helping the problem