It can work for a couple of years if you manage to get 50 former intel agents to sign off on it as fake. That only last for a couple years though. Eventually it's smoked out that the intel agents were lying.
Pathetic when you point out the danger of 50 people lying about data and getting busted for lying only to get downvoted..meh. So is the world we live in. It's fine up until the point however people are lying about your own personal court case. At that point the rule of law means something again.
Maybe you could explain what on earth you're actually talking about rather than expecting us to not only infer it but be sympathetic to supposed censorship?