Honestly this kind of stuff is already boring. It's an extremely simplified explanation, and overall a pretty low effort post. Don't get me wrong, ChatGPT is amazing, and I had it write me some recipes in Plato's voice. But now the novelty has worn off and this is essentially throwaway content. It's not contributing anything to the discussion.
It's actually a pretty good ELI5 explanation of attention - "ingenious mechanism which illuminates certain symbols with a bright light"...
It’s cool, I got -2’d and youre still up, I misread the room. Just hope it’s not the future here, no reason why other people shouldn’t post ones as a wizard, orc, crypto ceo…
Its getting down voted because if people want that sort of thing they can generate it themselves.
There's a sort of circular logic there: the alchemist one is fine because people wanted it, the other ones aren't fine because people don't want it. I prefer an HN that ends up skipping "explain [ARTICLE] as $X" altogether unless $X is on-topic