Would any reader who did not already know the name of the standard Haskell compiler have been any more enlightened if it had said "Glasgow Haskell Compiler" in the first paragraph? As it stands, the first paragraph of the article merely strongly implies it's an optimising compiler for Haskell, moderately strongly implies that it's the compiler for Haskell, and links to the GHC GitLab. I assert that the only reason one might want the words "Glasgow Haskell Compiler" here is if you wanted to search for it unambiguously, but "GHC haskell" is already entirely unambiguous. It's not like the name is descriptive; you're not going to do anything differently because it was born at the University of Glasgow.