You ask them to leave, they do not... Unless the "security" recorded and streamed everything into cloud, very difficult to prove.
You cannot just shoot someone who is standing outside your doorway, And claim that they were trying to break in.
You would go to jail.
You could go to jail. In some state's in the US, it is by no way guaranteed.
One day I came into my kitchen, there is my wife crying, and three big threating guys I do not know. I ask them to leave, instead of heading to door, they are aggressive and surround me. What do you thing is going to happen?
You better hope they are not actually aggressive? How are you getting out of this scenario other than being submissive or hoping they are "nice".
There are so many Clint Eastwoods in this thread.
That is why it is very stupid idea, to threaten people at their property!
I had the impression you were one of these guys that daydream about their (unrealistic) home defense plans.
It does not allow you to just shoot someone, who is standing outside your door.
If they broke into your house, then yes it might apply.
But it absolutely does not allow you to just shoot someone, who knocked on your door.
This guy wasn't even on his porch. Stand your ground laws essentially allow gun owners to claim they were frightened for their lives so that becomes "their castle". Wouldn't be very hard to repurpose this kind of weaponized law to actually defend your household.
btw - castle doctrine was intended to apply within property lines. If someone is on your doorstep, they are likely already clearly on your property.
All of this is theoretical but honestly I wouldn't be surprised if this is used for exactly what you said it shouldn't allow.
According to the zimmerman trial, if you look into it at all, Zimmerman claimed that he was being attacked, got knocked over on the ground, and then while the attacker was on top of him, yelling that he was going to kill him, he defended himself with a gun, at that point.
And there was some physical evidence and injuries supporting this narrative.
You can say that his statement is a lie, or that you don't believe his testimony.
But, if that testimony is true, Shooting someone who is on top of you, assaulting you, yelling that you are going to die, while you are on the ground, is a much different situation than shooting someone who just knocked on your door.
I would really recommend you look up that case more, if you thought it was in any way similar to "just shooting someone, at your door".
> He put himself in danger for the sole purpose of being able to use his weapon
Possibly. That doesn't contradict my statement though.
It is still completely irrelevant to the idea that a person could just shoot someone, who is at their front door.
A more accurate comparison, would be if someone was at your front door, and then that person gets on top of you, yells that they are going to kill you, starts punching you while being on top of you, and causes verifiable head injuries and head bleedings too you, and then you shoot them.
So, at the end of the day, the comparison is still irrelevant to a situation where someone merely knocks on your door.