So if others want to compete, they'll always be a few years behind, since the fab capacity is reserved to Apple. So any competitor either has to magically improve the architecture dramatically - which they can't, since that would require an architectural license which Apple has, but most others don't - or find a fab that can compete with TSMC's latest tech both in terms of price and available volume.
See for example https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/4922vs5022vs5008vs5189/...
And that is a lie, to achieve those scores it turbos and consumes 300W+ at turbo.
Today, right now, is a moment where AMD's enterprise product are outperforming Intel's in benchmarks.
Except for a very small set of specific use cases, I think anyone recommending Xeon for enterprise solutions is professionally negligent.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/5022vs5008vs5189vs5031/...
Using the last ASML's technology is a big part of the situation Using on-chip memory is another