Hacker News Reader

Comment by amanaplanacanal | Hacker News Reader

It's definitely a lot slower paced than our current ADD society is used to. An esteemed director like Kubrick's movies would seem unbearably slow to many.

View on HN

I think Kubrick's movies are fantastic, deep, atmospheric, thought provoking. True art.

I have never made it all the way through one without falling asleep. 2001, Blade Runner, Dr. Strangelove.... Even movies loosely associated with Kubrick like A.I. cause me to nod off. I have to stop when I'm nodding off and come back later fresh in order to finish.

Maybe it would be different if I had seen them in theaters.

> 2001, Blade Runner, Dr. Strangelove....

Gladiator was also amazing!

Love that film. "No, I'm Spartacus!" Classic.

spartacus, spartacus the merciful \o/

Gladiator was shot by Ridley Scott, just like Blade Runner. Kubrick (who i love) is so legendary, he really should just get credit for every great movie in existence ))

Blade Runner is not a Kubrick film.

You're right. My mistake for lumping that in there.

I've never fallen asleep while watching 2001. It's definitely slow, but riveting for me, because (like Tarkovsky's film) there's a lot of meaning in the scenes, and they give me a lot to think about.

> "Maybe it would be different if I had seen them in theaters."

There's still chances to see 2001 in cinemas! It gets re-released somewhat regularly for anniversaries and Kubrick retrospectives, etc. I was born long after 2001 came out, but I've seen it on cinema screens many times. It was so far ahead of it's time and looks so incredibly good in 70mm that it's mind boggling to consider that it was actually made in the 1960s!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com