> the definition of Hindutva according to the Supreme Court
Legal definitions aren’t relevant to Twitter accounts. What matters is what’s animating the author.
Legal definitions aren’t relevant to Twitter accounts. What matters is what’s animating the author.
This reminds me of the hacker/cracker and crypto qua -currency/-tography debates. Or, more pointedly, the Daughters of the Confederacy.
Legal definitions aren’t “actual definitions.” Nobody likes a term they’ve adopted to be coöpted. But it happens, and it’s happened with hindutva in English.