Interesting. I wonder how it compares to Voila. What I like about Voila is that you can use ipywidgets natively and then render Jupyter Notebooks directly to a web-app. Maybe this will be a decent competitor.
Mercury, in my view, seems really interesting for quick demos and reports. It's somewhat akin to Streamlit, making it ideal for notebook authors.
On the other end of the spectrum (and pardon my shameless plug here), there's Solara (https://github.com/widgetti/solara/). Solara is a fully-fledged web framework for Python, specifically designed to handle app sizes that surpass what Streamlit and Dash can manage. It's worth noting that Solara can render ipywidgets, using a pure Python React-like framework. This can be particularly useful after the exploration phase, when you're looking to transition a project from the notebook into production.
I think what sets Solara apart from the rest is that we use a 10 year proven paradigm, React, but on the Python side, although with a more Pythonic API. For instance making reusable components in Python is a real benefit. Pynecone uses ReactJS in the front end, but on the Python side it’s their own API.
I do like pynecone, their API is pretty. I do wonder with many of these frameworks. Does the paradigm works for more complex apps, or does it end in complexity hell once you go past the hello world examples. At least React has proven itself.
> For instance making reusable components in Python is a real benefit.
I think that could be a big benefit for us because we ran into problems when we wanted to create a custom component for a different Data Grid in Pynecone. In particular we tried to wrap AG Grid but ran into problems when we tried to change the styling because we couldn't overwrite the DIV element's class. Is that something that would be possible in Solara?
What Data Grids do you currently provide in Solara?
I tried to look at your Components API docs at https://solara.dev/docs/api but that's currently returning an error:
> "No object with name Page found for /opt/render/project/src/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/solara/website/pages/docs/__init__.py We did find: 'Path' or 'generate_routes_directory' or 'title' or 'HERE' or 'routes'"
Let’s take that question to GitHub or discord not to go too much off topic here ok? Thanks!
Voila is the obvious competitor to this. There are also different oranges and apples such as Dash, Streamlit, Panel: https://anaconda.cloud/dashboardlandscape - obviously Anaconda is a bit biased here.
I suppose the biggest limitation to Mercury is the limited number of widgets. Good for quick demos.
Also deployment is a bit unclear at the moment - I wonder how easy it is to keep Mercury deployed in a separate Docker container - that is I do not want to keep random ports open on my notebook server.
Then again probably deployment/hosting is how Mercury expects to make some money.
We hope to extend widgets offering in the near future.
You are right. We are working on Mercury Cloud service where you can just upload notebook to deploy it. We have free and paid plans. But you can also self-host Mercury with docker-compose.
- Mercury has no callbacks - we automatically re-execute cells below updated widget,
- Mercury has no layout widgets, all input widgets are always in the left sidebar and output content appear in the same order as in notebook.
Thanks to above decisions you don't need to rewrite your notebook to fit UI framework paradigms.
Humbly recommend when you share a product, you include a link to it ;)