I see this comment a lot, but I drew a different conclusion. People with high reading / writing ability assign less value to GPT's writing ability, whereas people with lower reading / writing ability assign more value to GPT's ability.
Edit:
> yet when I see their prompt, I realize it was a bad prompt.
So, I asked ChatGPT to re-write my reply.
----
Prompt: "Re-write this text, but more intelligently."
Output: I frequently encounter this observation, yet I have arrived at a divergent inference. Individuals possessing exceptional proficiency in reading and writing tend to ascribe a diminished significance to the writing aptitude of GPT, whereas individuals with more limited abilities in reading and writing tend to attach greater value to GPT's prowess.
----
Prompt: "Re-write this text, but make it sound better."
Output: I frequently encounter this recurring sentiment, yet I have formulated an alternative perspective. Individuals endowed with advanced reading and writing prowess tend to bestow a lesser degree of importance upon GPT's writing ability, whereas individuals possessing more modest proficiency in reading and writing are inclined to accord greater significance to GPT's remarkable capabilities.
-----
Prompt: "Re-write this text, but try and use the word 'ability' less."
Output: I frequently come across this comment, but my conclusion differs. Individuals who excel in reading and writing tend to place a diminished emphasis on GPT's writing prowess, while those with more limited skills in reading and writing tend to attach greater importance to GPT's capabilities.
----
Conclusion: I like my original reply better than GPT's re-write.