It's an editorial from one of their technology editors. I have read a ton of useful editorials from Nature throughout my academic career -- not sure if it's beyond their scope, but I would be sad to see it go.
I thought you needed to publish amazing discoveries to get in. We have a million articles about prompting already.
For an article in the Nature scientific journal, sure. For an op-ed on Nature.com? Nah.
0185 clickbait with absolut common advices. This could be written by ChatGPT.
If you frequently browse Hacker News, you are probably not the main audience. I just sent this to one of my less technology-savvy colleagues in my discipline, because it is difficult to find content that provides a realistic expectation of what ChatGPT can and cannot do for people who do not currently write code but need to keep up with things.