Zero specific claims. Zero evidence examined by the person making the allegations. All hearsay.

To top it off, the focus of the story, David Charles Grusch, is a "a former intelligence official."

Pardom me for disregarding this as the diversion it appears to be. The US military has quite a track record on this kind of thing. It's not hard to think of reasons why such diversions might be deployed right now, either.

Maybe some kind of physical evidence - any physical evidence - will be presented. If so, I'm happy to change my mind. Until then, there's zero compelling reason to believe any of it and every reason to think Grusch either a liar or a stooge.