From past experience, the hackernews crowd is super hostile to tools/etc with opt-out [telemetry](https://www.getdaft.io/projects/docs/en/latest/telemetry.htm...).
As a performance-driven project it’s important for us to understand which operations and use-cases are slowest/buggiest for our users so that we can focus on them. We tried to be very intentional in scoping the telemetry we collect and take this very seriously (telemetry is top-level on both our docs and README).
Happy to hear any feedback on this - we understand it's an important topic.
[Edit: parent link was fixed, thanks! :)]
I don't have strong opinions either way in this. But it's usually something that sparks a big flaming thread.
"...consent options structured as an opt-out selected by default is a violation of the GDPR..."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regula...