Hacker News Reader

Comment by Invictus0 | Hacker News Reader

Patagonia didn't take VC money, and reddit wouldn't have even survived this long if they hadn't

> and reddit wouldn't have even survived this long if they hadn't

The parts of Reddit that people actually like – a single lightweight web app (old.reddit.com) minus all the fluff (constant redesigns, broken video player, live streaming service, overengineered mobile apps, avatars, NFTs, coins/gifts, social networking, chat, clubhouse competitor, expensive acquisitions) – would have survived perfectly well without VC money.

How so? It costs money to store & retrieve this content, at reddit scale (100m active monthly?). Ads clearly weren't paying enough of the bills, so what's the next best option?

You know: solving the engineering problem you just described...

Reddit made $500M in revenue last year, yet is unprofitable. The reason isn't its AWS bill, but the "must 5x every year no matter what" mentality of their VCs who are looking for their exit. This pushes companies to overhire, add useless features and waste money on user acquisition just to chase that growth chart and have a successful IPO roadshow.

How true is that honestly?

The more I talk to people the more I feel like people just like to party/waste money more than work.

> The more I talk to people the more I feel like people just like to party/waste money more than work.

Is... that a surprise to you?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com