Lawyers use specific case law databases and they SHOULD approach any new tools with healthy skepticism.
And if he googled it and cited a fake case would it be better? Why wouldn’t you vet the information.
Disbarment is equivalent to taking away his entire life's work.
Two minute hate on the internet every day is fun and all but it's not that severe.
This is like surgeon doing wrong procedure he just invented on patient.
'Lawyer' is the kind of profession which actually holds its practitioners to a standard, because the system falls apart when they stop behaving honestly.
This wasn't an oopsie-daisies, this was dishonesty, followed by further dishonesty, when they supplied bogus references for these cases.
No, they wouldn’t
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.57...
How can anyone trust anything a lawyer does, when they are willing to fabricate documents, in order to continue to lie to a judge? This is Better Call Saul-level chicanery.
He could have fessed up and apologized when called out on it, but he doubled down.