Yeah, no.

Improved tooling to address common problems is absolutely the future. "Self-healing" is a long way off, because LLMs lack reasoning abilities to determine if a fix is good. And "makes the test pass" isn't a great indicator - because flaky tests exists, and the plugin mentioned at the end is a great way to introduce random mutations. Unless you'd like to re-run the full test suite, it's dangerous malpractice, and even then it's high risk.

Human-in-the-loop continues to be a necessary criterion for applied stochastics in code production.