Person A made something and is granting access to their creation subject to certain conditions. Person B finds a way to access the creation while circumventing the creators conditions. This is clearly wrong.
Of course, this particular conditions are legal, but that doesn't mean they're not abusive too.
If paying for music is so abusive then why not just make your own music instead?
What you can is not necessarily what you should be able to do.
If paying for music is so abusive then why not just make your own music instead?
I never said paying for music is abusive. I said not being able to share stuff you bought - or that someone has voluntarily shared with you - is abusive.