A Huawei bid turned into a hunt for a corporate mole
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
"The day the TDC team set up in Plesner’s offices, the law firm’s IT systems came under a denial-of-service hacking attack."
"At 12:20 a.m. on March 20, a security guard patrolling the Plesner offices noticed lights floating outside the 15th-floor room where TDC’s team had been working. Peering into the glare, he saw a large drone. For 10 minutes it remained there, flying up, down and sideways. Then it descended out of sight. Upon learning of the incident the following morning, the TDC investigators realized they’d failed to close the shades in the office. There was a wall-size whiteboard facing the windows on which they’d been tracing all of their leads, and it would have been in full view."
Makes it much more clear why there was so much saber-rattling about them.
I am not a lawyer, but surely there are legal consequences to utilising intellectual properties obtained via illegitimate means, any legal specialists here?
First, recall that Nortel collapsed because of its own bad investments during the Dot Com Bubble, followed by an accounting scandal.
Second, Huawei was barely even on the scene yet when Nortel collapsed. Huawei was still operating almost entirely inside China at the time. It wasn't Nortel's major competitor.
There is another story from ancient times tells the tale about two big telecom company in China stealing or damaging each other's production equipment/infrastructures installed on the streets... knowing that, the act of photographing your whiteboard with drone suddenly sounded well within the realm of possible things that could happen.
China's aggressive 'Wolf Warrior Diplomacy' : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_warrior_diplomacy
That's some James Bond sh*t right there!
Bloomberg's previous piece about China installing tiny chips onto server hardware to spy on tech giants was called out as a big lie:
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-h...
- https://siliconangle.com/2018/10/22/apple-amazon-super-micro...
Now we have a similarly sensational story about China coming from them. Should we trust them? Or is this just another small skirmish in the larger information war being waged between USA vs China around the world right now. A war where truth was the first casualty.
That doesn’t make this story true though. Particularly when you consider how discredited this particular journalist’s previous story about China was.
TDC has stated to Danish media that they "recognize parts of the story" but have refused to elaborate. They haven't wished to refute any parts either.
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/business/2023-06-16-tdc-genkender-del...
This is about a goal oriented Chinese spy op in Denmark related to 5G.
The Cisco software issue was pretty minor, and was settled almost 20 years ago.
Nobody commenting on this article has blamed Huawei for Nortel's collapse yet you keep bringing up that it wasn't Huawei's fault. Why is that?
There are countless examples not just from the US but EU, Australia, Canada etc.
Take these claims with a huge grain of salt.
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-h...
- https://siliconangle.com/2018/10/22/apple-amazon-super-micro...
Something smells fishy.
https://nyheder.tv2.dk/business/2023-06-16-tdc-genkender-del...
Archive directly from host www.bloomberg.com
podcast : https://omny.fm/shows/listen-to-the-story/how-a-huawei-mole-...
"At the same time, the Chinese government is seeking to become the world’s greatest superpower through predatory lending and business practices, systematic theft of intellectual property, and brazen cyber intrusions."
And just recently:
https://apnews.com/article/korea-samsung-china-copycat-semic...
"South Korean prosecutors have arrested and indicted a former executive of Samsung Electronics suspected of stealing trade secrets while attempting to establish a copycat computer chip plant in China."
There are literally hundreds of articles like this - and it's been going on for decades. But the behavior alleged in this article seems even more blatent and aggressive than the past, and perhaps a foreshadowing of what is to come in the near future.
If liberal western (and I mean liberal not "liberal") democracies stop our appeasement policies things will improve.
China has been very reserved on the international scene in the last 40 years or so. It hasn't fought any foreign wars, and it's been mostly focused on its own internal economic development. That development has also brought enormous wealth to the United States and other developed countries, which have been able to access (previously cheap) Chinese labor and the rapidly growing Chinese market. Much of the modern American way of life over the last few decades would have been impossible without the economic development of China.
Since Trump came into office, there has been an incredible swing in American public opinion on China. China is now to blame for everything, an embodiment of pure evil, lurking around every corner. Maybe China is in the room with us right now.
It's sad to see this attitude spilling over into HN. The tech industry is incredibly international (and Chinese engineers make a major contribution to the US tech industry), and not only does the increasing animosity go against the open spirit of tech culture, but it will severely damage the industry in the long run as international barriers go up.
China and the US both understand how to acquire power by carrying a big stick. The difference is that the US also knows how to speak softly to retain it. That's why the US projects power with cooperation and diplomacy, while China relies on coercion and deceit.
Everyone has heard of Guantanamo Bay. The Cuban government isn't happy about the presence of a US military base on their territory.
First comes military parity.
Then come politicians who think it'd be a grand idea to use that to drive more favorable bargains.
Then come politicians who figure it'd be better off if they just controlled the whole thing.
The core problem in this case is China. Not someone willing to help because there is a clear problem with China.
China has none of those. And they really do matter.
Yes you do. That what butwhataboutism is all about.