See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31813957 (I noticed shortcut and linear being popularish alternatives there) and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25212441 which I always think of when Jira is discussed.
See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31813957 (I noticed shortcut and linear being popularish alternatives there) and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25212441 which I always think of when Jira is discussed.
By which I mean, I've heard _dozens_ of cases, but they rarely amount to more than a gripes-fueled gish gallop. Even rarer still is the offer of a functional alternative, and on the rare occasions I have seen one adopted, the same gripes have reared their heads pretty quickly.
"I just want to do X, why won't it let me" is the most common, and it is akin to "works on my machine" for me. JIRA isn't trying to solve for ten sets of workflow preferences, it's trying to give you the minimal set whereby you can reasonably track and deliver. Anything more than that is noise, not signal.
It only gets worse when you're working with addons - half of the UI of any ticket is things I have to go hide because one team integrated Figma with Jira and now it shows up on every project and ticket.
You can have any funky workflows you want, but labels and I think components are instance-globals.