The intent is good, but what are we talking about here? This law, the “Digital Millennium Copyright Act”, used to pull down content that is effectively an invasion of privacy? How do those things at all intersect?
It’s too broad and too able to be abused. Laws should be very precise and narrow.
Regarding privacy, we should have laws on the books to protect one’s privacy in cases where the public as no interest of import.
We’re not arbitrarily sending DMCA’s to get things taken down. Our copyright holders haven’t approved of and are not benefiting from the financial gains of their stolen works.
It sounds cold to phrase it that way, but that’s how America protects its people, only as a function of money.
I applaud your work and I stand by what I said about narrow and focused laws for protecting privacy. It’s not every day we can do something good with something bad, but I don’t know if the good that is done fully outweighs the bad that it causes, especially when better options could exist.